The Long Game

Thank you to Slash and Betty White for reminding us to be cool and play the long game!

By now everyone has seen last week’s earnings highlights.  The one that really caught my attention read “Goldman Pays Up for Talent, Sending Profits Down”.  Huh?  In 2021, Goldman reported record net earnings of $21.6 billion, more than double 2020 results of $9.5 billion, and more than double results in recent history, $8.5 billion in 2019, and $10.5 billion in 2018. 

JP Morgan was hit with a similar headline, “Wells Fargo Up, JP Morgan Down”.  This on 2021 net earnings of $48.3 billion, which soared 66% to 2020 results.  

These onerous headlines were referring to quarterly changes.  Goldman Q4 net earnings of $3.9 billion fell (27%) to Q3, and (13%) year over year.  JP Morgan Q4 results of $10.4 billion fell (11%) to Q3 and (14%) year over year.  This is important because long term capital appreciation demands a long term growth strategy.  The problem is short-termism.  CEO’s are under enormous pressure to deliver strong quarterly earnings reports and to distribute wealth rather than reinvest.  Investors responded this time by sending shares of Goldman and JP Morgan down.  

In a 2015 article I wrote, McKinsey’s Dominic Barton, BlackRock’s Laurence Fink, and Rodel CEO Bill Budinger intensified the debate on the short term approach, challenging leaders to play the long game.

I think Jamie Dimon got it right in his response to investors, “We will be competitive in  pay.  If that squeezes margins a little bit for shareholders, so be it.”  Further, Mr. Dimon asserted that JP Morgan wouldn’t meet its longer-term target returns this year and maybe next year.  I’d say that qualifies as playing the long game, as Laurence Fink’s 2015 letter to Fortune 500 CEOs urged.

While Wells Fargo is cutting costs, other banks with bigger Wall Street operations reported higher expenses, largely because investment banking and trading results have soared, with the demand for talent high.  It has taken more than ten years for global markets volume to rebound since the near collapse of the world financial system in 2008 and 2009.  This is welcome news not only for an industry forever changed by these events, but for New York City and State tax coffers.  This will also help small business in the New York metro area, COVID notwithstanding, in a city metropolis plagued by increasing income disparity.

What else are the big banks investing in?  The answer is technology.  Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) factor squarely in post trade settlement.  Ongoing transformation in cloud operations, interconnection, communication services, payments, and enhanced data security are also garnering noteworthy investment.  

Technology spend worldwide is projected to grow 5.5% in 2022 to $4.5 trillion.  This follows a robust level of investment in 2021.  As one example, investments in European tech firms soared to $93.3 billion last year, a record, and a 142% increase over the year before, according to CB Insights. 

U.S. Banks are very focused on this.  JP Morgan has instituted a technology in residence program and recruited McKinsey Partner Neha Gargi as their new Head of Global Technology Strategy. 

Goldman is leaning forward as well with deep talent search.  In Spring 2021, they reached out to me, having identified my trading technology FP&A background.  I interviewed with a veteran new hire leading their technology efforts in their Americas Operations group.  This person had an engineering and product background outside capital markets, most recently within the APAC region.  I didn’t land the role but it really caught my attention, revealing the intensity of their strategic focus.

Where is this all leading?  Utilizing the long game, I’m bullish on America and believe we can transform the U.S. economy and regain the top spot from China.  But we need to get going on this.  

In some related good news, mountains have moved on Capitol Hill with groundbreaking bipartisan support in the U.S. Senate, with passage of the $250 billion U.S. Innovation and Competition Act, also known as the Endless Frontier Act.  This week the U.S. House takes up this effort, largely seen as a critical and effective means to counter China’s technological ambitions. 

So let’s get moving!  What are your thoughts on this?  I’d love to hear!

As always I’m reminded that nothing lasts forever, even cold November rain.  Hmm, sounds like song lyrics. Enjoy!

Guns N’ Roses November Rain

Feature Photo courtesy of the IMGUR platform and the L.A. Zoo, on whose Board Slash sits, along with Betty White when she was still with us.

Please note Addendum links below to supporting articles.

Goldman Sachs Sees Profits Slips

Wells Fargo Up, JP Morgan Down

Cynthia 2015 Article Long Term Capital Appreciation  

Banks like JP Morgan: Inflation Is A Double Edged Sword

Gartner projecting $4.5 trillion Tech Spend

European Tech Scene

JP Morgan Technology In Residence

JP Morgan hires new Head of Global Technology Strategy

Bipartisan Senate Passes Bill To Boost China Competitiveness

U.S. House Takes Up China Competitiveness Bill

Global Leadership: U.S. Call To Action!

The United States of America is at an inflection point in the global economy, $20.8 trillion in 2020 to China $24.2 trillion.  The dominant leader since WWII, the U.S.’s reign was first challenged in 2008 with the near collapse of the global economy.  The first unprecedented U.S. bailout of $466 billion, in combination with a ($243) billion drop in gross domestic product (GDP) in one year, kicked off new levels of debt that, in the absence of transformative GDP growth, would be hard to overcome.  JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon, in a keynote interview at the Wall Street Journal’s (WSJ) CEO Summit in early May, says the U.S. hasn’t experienced healthy growth in the last twenty years.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, the second keynote speaker at the Summit, acknowledged that it took the U.S. almost a decade to get back on track following the 2008 financial crisis, and that we lost a lot in the process.  So where are we now?  After U.S. Debt to GDP hit 52.2% in 2009, it has risen further still to 71.9% in 2015, and 78.4% in 2019.

During that same period, China’s long term ability to recover and grow has exceeded that of its only serious competitor, the United States of America.  After flirting with the top spot in 2009, China’s economy first took a small lead over the U.S. in 2017, then widened that in 2020.  The International Monetary Fund (IMF) projects China’s economy will grow to $35.9 trillion by 2025, far outpacing the U.S. forecast of $25.8 trillion.  GDP figures adjusted for purchasing power parity provide the true picture.  India is in a distant third at $8.7 trillion, while Japan, Germany, and the top 10 European economies have barely moved, huddled under $5 trillion in 2020.

The COVID pandemic and America’s second unprecedented bailout and stimulus package totaling $6.2 trillion raised the ante again, bringing the United States debt level to $21 trillion entering 2021, exceeding GDP at a 101% total Debt to GDP ratio.

To be clear, economists will tell you that a 4% deficit to GDP annual spending ratio is normal.  But that guidance takes on new meaning when you’ve experienced a 9.8% and 15.1% deficit to GDP spending ratio in two of the last twelve years.

China’s entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001 changed the game.  That, coupled with U.S. corporations’ short term profit focus, with increasing levels of service outsourcing and product importing, has put the United States of America in a position of catch up.

As the United States Trade Data Trends graph demonstrates, U.S. corporations have been betting against American ingenuity and talent since 1980, exporting services and talent overseas, and then importing resulting product.  You could argue this strategy has worked well, as the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) has grown exponentially from $963.99 in 1980 to $30,606.48 to end 2020.

Multiple well respected business minds argue otherwise, and have been raising the alarms in recent years. The pressure for CEOs to deliver in the short term is significant.  Outsourcing is a quick solution in a truly global world, where the rules are not all the same.

BlackRock’s Larry Fink led his 2021 annual address to shareholders expressing “steadfast commitment to long-termism”.  This follows his 2016 letter to every Fortune 500 CEO, urging corporate leaders to “play their part by persuasively communicating their company’s long-term strategy for growth”.

In 2015, McKinsey & Company Global Managing Director Dominic Barton and Canada Pension Plan Investment Board CEO Mark Wiseman launched an initiative to promote a longer term focus in business, following a survey of 1,000+ C level executives and board members, where 79% said they felt pressure to deliver financial results in a two year time frame.

Bill Budinger, inventor, entrepreneur, founder & CEO of Rodel, Inc., a firm that manufactures electronics products, argues American investors are killing their golden geese, where planting has been replaced by harvesting.

Can we reclaim our intended position as economic leader of the free world?  Absolutely!  America is the land of dreams and innovation! But we have a lot of work to do, in areas that to date, have alluded us.  This includes investment in education and training in manufacturing, and enduring development of STEM talent in segments of the population known to deliver, in particular women.

Ironically, timing of the COVID-19 pandemic recovery is in our favor.  JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon believes we are at a near “Goldilocks” level of recovery, that will deliver fast growth with mild inflation.  Janet Yellen agrees.  We need to seize this moment and to coin a gymnastics phrase, we need to hit four of four routines.

We must invest where ROI potential is greatest!  We can do that while also helping small business and people on the lower end of the income spectrum, who have been disproportionately hit by the COVID pandemic.  Brilliant!

A great example of this is Goldman Sachs’ pledge of $10 billion to their “One Million Black Women” Initiative, launched in March 2021.  They believe that reducing the earnings gap for Black women could create up to 1.7 million jobs and add $450 billion to U.S. GDP annually.  This follows on Goldman’s long term recognition of the power of the purse of women broadly.  Lloyd Blankfein, in a 2008 speech for their 10,000 Women Initiative had this to say.  “When you get to the topic of trying to invest and create GDP, there is no better, more efficient investment, there’s no lower hanging fruit in the world to pick, than the investment you make in women.”

Further, many U.S. firms are leaning in on digital transformation and ESG initiatives, recognizing the serious ROI potential.  It’s an exciting time where, not only do we have the opportunity to drive transformative innovation and restore balance on earth, but we can also restore broad based prosperity to the shrinking middle class, which after all, is the engine of the U.S. economy.

In 2016, following a decades long career in technology, most notably as the CIO of Verizon, Dr. Judith Spitz founded Break Through Tech at Cornell Tech in New York City, an initiative making headway increasing the number of women in computer science and tech careers.  An article in the WSJ reports that STEM fields are some of the fastest growing and most lucrative.  Increasing the number of women would likely have big  implications for the economy.

Another great organization, Girls Who Code, founded by Reshma Saujani, and currently led by CEO Tarika Barrett, is doing important work in education, trying to close the gender gap in tech.

A recent Newsweek survey notes that more than 4.5 million fewer women are employed now than at the beginning of the pandemic, bringing the labor participation rate for women to its lowest levels since 1988.  Some 44% of women who were unemployed in April 2021 have been out of work for longer than six months.  We need to act on that!  We need to action where GDP potential is greatest, if we’re serious about taking on China!

Turning to U.S. legislative initiatives, the likely to pass U.S. Senate led $190 billion Innovation and Competition Act, is intended to directly take on rising competition from China.  It includes $100 billion for R&D and investments in emerging technologies where the country that leads, will have a significant advantage in the global economy.  Artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), robotics, and high performance computing are critical areas of capability in practice today across the globe.  We have to get out in front on this!  And yes, unfortunately this is already impacting lower skilled workers who perform repetitive tasks.  Investment in our workforce with education and training is crucial.

$10 billion has been allocated to the U.S. Commerce Department to establish at least ten regional technology hubs, intended to take on the serious talent shortage we have in U.S. manufacturing.  It is estimated that 3.5 million U.S. manufacturing jobs will need to be filled in the next ten years, where the current U.S. skills gap will prevent 2 million of those jobs from being filled.  This could cost the U.S. economy as much as $1 trillion.

A newer level of concern surrounds a study published in early May 2021 by Deloitte and the National Association of Manufacturers.  It reports that while the COVID pandemic wiped out about 1.4 million manufacturing jobs, the industry has only been able to hire back about 820,000.

$52 billion has been designated to incentivize domestic semiconductor fabrication. Given the alarming 60 Minutes segment in early May, where we learned that Intel’s share of the market has dwindled to just 12%, and that the Republic of China’s Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) is producing chips that are 30% faster and more powerful than what we are able to make in the U.S, this is an area that requires intense focus and actionable strategy.  Chips are integral to our way of life.  Without them, we don’t use our phones or computers, and we don’t drive cars.

Everyone is in agreement on the value of investment in education and training, from the authors of the Penn Wharton Budget Model (PWBM) to Janet Yellen.  Jamie Dimon offers some targeted perspective.  He agrees that the Biden agenda is right on the issues, but that you can’t just throw money at them.  You have to be specific with measurable outcomes.  He made reference to his role on the New York Business Council where they’re trying to match education with jobs.

I recommend bringing together the Innovation and Competition Act’s $10 billion regional technology hubs plan with the $1.4 billion education investment piece of Biden’s American Families Plan.  We need committed resource at community and four year colleges, working in direct coordination with these regional technology hubs, in direct coordination with regional employers in need of specific talent.  Free college is only helpful if each and every student lands a job, that helps us drive innovation and GDP growth, in direct competition with China.  Yes we need that level of actionable specificity.

We need to bring the supply chain back to America.  Two words.  PPE.  Chips.  Before the COVID pandemic, China based firms produced about 50% of the world’s PPE supply.  One example where this really hurt us, follows a yearlong investigation by The Guardian and Kaiser Health.  They found that 3,607 U.S. healthcare workers lost their lives to COVID in the first year.  Many of these deaths were avoidable, with widespread PPE and mask shortages a contributing factor. That’s completely unacceptable!

Further, the U.S. is in an extremely vulnerable position with poor market share in the global semiconductor chip industry.  How is that playing out right now?  According to a May WSJ article, Americans are shopping for cars in near-record numbers, but the world’s computer-chip shortage has left dealers with the fewest offerings in decades, forcing auto makers to cut production of more than 1.2 million vehicles in North America.  If you’re really paying attention, then you’ll recall the $80 billion auto industry bailout in 2009.  What is the longer term ROI impact on that spend, given this current situation?  It’s clear we need a broader focus across American industry.

We need to make investments in infrastructure, where we currently rank 12th in the world.  We need specific focus on rail, water and the electric grid, and renewable energy where we rank 48th, 23rd, and 24th in the world respectively.  Negotiations continue on Capitol Hill to reach consensus on a spending plan, with the Biden administration currently at $1 trillion to the GOP’s $928 billion.  Sounds like we’re almost there!

We need to stop the global tax race to the bottom.  The Washington Post reported on May 31 that the G-7 is set to support Biden’s minimum global corporate tax.  While it’s early in the game, this is very encouraging news.

Please see graphs and article addendum below.  I hope I’ve got you thinking!  I’d love to hear your thoughts and questions!

I’d like to lead us out with this epic Rock&Roll ballad from the wildly talented, science minded Kiszka brothers.  Here’s Greta Van Fleet with their newly released album The Battle At Gardens Gate.  Out of silence, we will sing! Broken Bells

Graphs:

DJIA Trend

U.S. Trade Data Trends

US Deficit to GDP Trend

US Debt to GDP Trend

Top 10 EUR Economies Trend to US & China

US Trade Balance Top 5 Economies Trend

US China Trade Balance Trend

US Germany Trade Balance Trend

Addendum for your reference and knowledge:

McKinsey Dominic Barton Focusing Capitol on the Long Term

American Investors Killing Their Golden Geese

In the capital markets and technology space, check out these four firms leading on digital transformation and sustainability.

BNY Mellon Future First

Equinix Sustainability

Zscaler Zero Trust

CITI ESG

WSJ Women In Technology

Newsweek Pandemic Cost To Women

U.S. Innovation and Competition Act

Deloitte Manufacturing Skills Gap

PBS News Hour Cutthroat Global Competition For PPE

60 Minutes Semiconductor Chip Shortage

The Guardian U.S. Healthcare Workers Lost to COVID

Living the Rock & Roll American Dream

How are you living the American Dream? For me it’s numbers, gymnastics, and rock & roll. Born energetic and inquisitive, with an insatiable appetite for knowledge, I’ve been an avid reader my whole life. I analyze and question everything! I was lucky, raised by highly educated parents with financial means. I did well in school and basically got everything I asked for. Reality set in by the time I was 24 though, with both of my parents gone. It was me and my autistic brother ready to take on the world! Our parents taught us to work hard, show respect, and try to make the world a better place. I’m certain we’ve made them proud! And I’ll bet they’d get a big kick out of my bucket list photo with Steven and Joe.

In general, most Americans agree that everyone should have a chance to improve themselves and do better in life. Hard work, higher education, civic participation, and a level playing field matter greatly. Today though, America faces serious challenges on both widening economic and political inequality, and the interplay between these two problems.

It is widely recognized that increasing income & wealth inequality is a major problem and that addressing this issue is critical to promote strong and sustained growth. The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) reports that rising inequality cost the U.S. economy almost 7% between 1990 and 2010. In 2013, income of the top 10% was 19 times higher than the bottom 10%. That ratio was 12.5 in the mid 1990’s and 11 in the mid 1980’s. “Countries that promote equal opportunity for all from an early age are those that will grow and prosper.”  http://www.bbc.com/news/business-30390232

In recent years Lloyd Blankfein has spoken about the need for public policies that promote fairer distribution of wealth, while not overly crimping its creation. He rose from income disparity in an East New York housing project to become CEO of Goldman Sachs, and Wall Street’s newest billionaire at 60. “I know I’m a big fat cat, plutocrat kind of guy, but I will tell you I’ve been the beneficiary of some of these redistribution policies, living in public housing and getting need based scholarships to Harvard.” http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-17/blankfein-becomes-billionaire-riding-goldman-s-shares-to-riches?cmpid=linkedin.company

The Economic Policy Institute (EPI) warns that wage stagnation is the country’s greatest economic challenge. Wages for most American workers have stagnated or declined since 1979, and expanding over the last 12 years to college educated workers. In the same period of time, economy wide productivity has risen by 64%. This means that the potential for adequate widespread wage growth has existed for 3+ decades, but has not happened for most. The U.S. middle class had $17,867 less income in 2007 because of the growth of inequality since 1979.

http://www.epi.org/pay-agenda/ http://www.epi.org/publication/charting-wage-stagnation/

In a September 2014 Economist article, central bankers tell how they used to worry about a return to the price wage spiral days of the 1970’s. Since the 2008 financial crisis though, the worry is now on stagnant wages and the growing risk of deflation. They feel a healthy and sustained recovery in the rich world will remain elusive until the pay squeeze ends. http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21615589-throughout-rich-world-wages-are-stuck-big-freeze

This leads to the discussion of how rising political inequality factors into the equation. A study at Northwestern University found that policy preferences of the affluent (top 1% of US wealth holders) vary widely from those of the general public, who are more open to policies reducing inequality. The wealthy are extremely politically active and have far greater influence than the general public. As to policy preferences, 40% of the affluent favor minimum wage reform, compared to 78% of the general public. A notable area of difference is deficit reduction. 87% of the affluent name budget deficits as the top problem facing our country. The general public is concerned about budget deficits as well, but to a lesser degree. 2012 CNN exit polls showed 59% considered the economy the most important issue, compared to 15% who named the deficit. http://www.russellsage.org/research/reports/wealthy-americans-political-preferences

A key policy area deemed critical to upward social mobility is higher education. While affluent Americans and business leaders broadly favor access to higher education, they often do not prioritize education policies over other goals such as lower taxes. In New Jersey for example, Governor Christie, whom affluent voters supported by a 21% margin in 2009, has issued more than $1.57 billion in corporate tax breaks, while cutting school district funding in 2010 and 2011 by $1.3 billion. Education advocates successfully sued the state for failing to meet minimum education standards. A judge ruled the plan underfunded schools by $1.6 billion over two years. 59% of New Jersey registered voters opposed those steep education cuts. Similar cuts to education and expansion of tax credits favoring the wealthy and business have occurred in Florida and Pennsylvania, where Governors were elected with strong affluent voter support.

Voting is one of the most concrete ways that citizens influence public policy. 82% of Americans making over $150,000 voted in the 2008 Presidential election, compared to 65% making under $50,000, and just 50% for those making under $30,000.

Looking at 2012 Presidential campaign contributions, while just 0.07% of the US population gave $2,500 or more, this totaled $1.4 billion. The total for those giving $200-$2,500 was $486 million, and small donors giving less than $200 totaled $313 million.

http://www.demos.org/stacked-deck-how-dominance-politics-affluent-business-undermines-economic-mobility-america

I love numbers because they tell a story! My brain finds solutions through numbers. As an analyst in the highly competitive and rapidly evolving capital markets industry, you have to stay abreast of a lot of “number intelligence”. There are many specifics that would probably fill a complete blog post for each, and perhaps I’m already formulating ideas for the coming months. But if we turn our focus more broadly, economic activity across the US and global economy is where it begins. I am so grateful for the mentors in my life who afford me the opportunity to discover and learn a diverse, and often provocative, set of information and stats. As I pulled this post together, I gained new understanding I find compelling. Isn’t that what it’s all about?

As for living the American Dream, my brother Geoffrey will surely continue to build model airplanes and call me with excitement every time a Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey or a Black Hawk Sikorsky helicopter flies over Riverdale. I’m going to keep modeling and analyzing numbers, judging & cheering on gymnasts, and saving my money so I can buy more rock & roll VIP tickets …

Life is short, make the most out of it, live with joy, purpose, and abundance… Dream On America!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54BCLYNkFKg